Yes. The Myers-Briggs describes how you prefer to take in information and make decisions, and there is nothing in that a Christian needs to be careful about. Carl Jung's theories are behind it, Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers built the instrument in the middle of the last century, and no part of it asks you to believe anything.
So the compatibility question takes about a paragraph. Here is the one that actually costs people something.
Half of everybody gets a different result the second time
This is the fact nobody writing about the MBTI for Christians will tell you, and it is the reason so many people stop trusting the whole thing without ever saying so out loud.
Take the assessment, wait a few weeks, take it again. Depending on which study you read, somewhere between half and two thirds of people come back with the same four letters. The rest get a different type. On the face of it that sounds like the instrument is worthless.
It is not, and the reason why is the useful part.
The four scales themselves are stable. Measured individually, the test-retest correlations run around 0.81 to 0.86, which is respectable. The instability is almost entirely at the cutoffs. Somebody who scores strongly introverted does not come back extraverted. What flips is the letter you were nearly tied on, the one where you sat a few points off the middle and the coin landed the other way.
So if your type changed, you learned something specific. You did not learn that the test is broken. You learned which of your four letters was never really a letter. That one is a genuine middle for you, and the honest read of your type is three preferences and one open hand.
That is worth more than a clean four-letter answer, and no assessment report will ever tell you.
The reason this fits Christianity better than a stable answer would
"For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known." (1 Corinthians 13:12)
Paul is not being modest here. He is describing the actual conditions. The mirrors he had in mind were polished metal, so the image came back real but soft, close enough to work with and not close enough to settle an argument.
Then look at what he does with the second half of the verse. He does not resolve the problem by promising you better self-knowledge. He resolves it by pointing at somebody who already knows you fully. Your partial view of yourself is not the last word about you, because it was never the authoritative one.
That is the right size for a personality type. It is a reflection in a mirror. It is real, it is useful, and it is not the thing itself, and a Christian has less at stake in getting it exactly right than almost anybody, because our identity was never supposed to rest on our own account of ourselves.
Which also means the danger runs the other way from where people usually point it. The problem is not that a Christian might take the MBTI too seriously as psychology. It is that they might take it seriously as an identity, and start saying "I'm an INFJ" the way you would say something that could not be otherwise.
What the four letters actually claim
Worth being precise, because most of the misuse starts with a misunderstanding here.
Each letter marks a preference, not a capacity. The first letter says where you get your energy, from the world outside you or from your own inner one. The second says what kind of information you notice first, what is concretely there or what it could become. The third says what you lean on when you decide, the logic of the thing or the effect on people. The fourth says how you like to meet the outside world, settled or open.
Nothing on that list is an ability, and nothing on it is a limit. An introvert can lead a room. A thinker can be tender. You will simply pay a different price for it than the person next to you, and the type tells you where the bill comes from.
That distinction is the whole reason this site exists. If preference is real but not binding, then the question "how do I connect with God" has a different answer for you than for the person in the next seat, and neither of you is doing it wrong.
Using it without letting it use you
Four rules. The fourth is the one people break.
Read scripture in the direction of your grain, then against it. If you are drawn to the abstract, you already read the parables well. Make yourself sit in the parts of the text that are just names and numbers and dimensions, since those were written for somebody, and it might be the person you are married to.
Pick a form of prayer that fits your wiring, and then do not stop there. Silence is not more spiritual than noise. It is easier for some people. Extraverts are not shallow for finding God in a crowded room, and introverts are not more devout for finding him alone at six in the morning. Start where you have traction, then borrow the other one occasionally, because the parts you find hardest are usually where you are least practiced rather than least suited.
Use it to explain yourself to people, not to excuse yourself to them. "I need a couple of hours alone after we host" is information your spouse can work with. "I'm an introvert" as the last word on why you left early is not.
Do not use it to pick people. Not for hiring, not for a ministry team, not for who to marry. Preferences do not predict competence, and a team screened for one profile is a team with one blind spot, held unanimously.
Where the Bible actually comes into this
People search for MBTI types of biblical figures constantly, and it is worth saying what that can and cannot be.
Scripture reports what people did. It almost never reports why, and it never reports how they preferred to make decisions, which is the thing a type is. So every list assigning four letters to Moses or Paul is somebody's impression, and the lists contradict each other, which is what you would expect from impressions.
What you can do is read the accounts for patterns of behaviour and notice which ones you recognise. That is a real exercise and it turns out to be a much better one. Myers-Briggs Bible characters covers why the lists disagree and what the text will actually support, and there are pages there for individual types built from the passages rather than from vibes.
Where to start
If you know your type, connecting with Jesus as your type is the practical end of all this: one passage, and practices built for how you are actually wired.
If you do not know it, here is where to take an assessment. Take the free one, sit with the result for a week, and pay attention to which letter you keep arguing with. That is the one to hold loosely.
And if you want the same question asked about the other system, should Christians use the Enneagram gets a more complicated answer, mostly because the history is contested and both sides of that argument have it wrong. The difference between the two is worth reading before you commit to either.
The MBTI is a mirror. Use it like one. Look, adjust, and then get on with the day.